The Relationship between Biology and Psychology Essay

The Relationship between Biology and Psychology - Essay Example For example, if a girl loses 10lbs in terms of biology, she would undoubtedly feel ecstatic, confident and extremely happy, and that will probably change her thinking in psychological terms. There are many people who distinguish between the biological and psychological phenomenon through assuming that these phenomena engross various structure, content, and causal mechanisms. For example, children are aware of bodily symptoms, such as coughing, but they are not aware of behavioral abnormalities, such as obsessively washing hands, which is contagious (Freberg 134). In today’s world, many people take the brain and nervous system for granted, which are actually the source of reason, sensation, intellect, and movement. This basic fact is not universally accepted throughout the human history. Although, there are few ancient observations that came close to the truth that the brain has a pivotal role in maintaining the life. Notaro, Gelman, and Zimmerman (2001) found that children do not believe in the psychological events, such as nervousness can result in physical health outcomes, such as pain in the stomach (Notaro, Gelman and Zimmerman 447). After the review of developmental and numerous cognitive kinds of literature, Satoshi (2004) had concluded that human beings are dualists, who have two different ways of looking at the world, in terms of souls and bodies, that means psychological and biological causes appears to be distinct in the minds of the people’s (Satoshi 382).

The Resilience of Affirmative Action and Its Still Relevant Today Research Paper

The Resilience of Affirmative Action and Its Still Relevant Today - Research Paper Example Various executive officials curtailed the enforcement of racial equality. Various government agencies, universities and corporations curtailed racial diversity. During this period, affirmative action grew stronger and more resilient. Affirmative action was shaped by a combination of normative and coercive factors within academic institutions. Universities emphasized the need for racial diversity and equality within their institutions. Civil rights activists and diversity professionals have contributed heavily to the creation and implementation of frameworks that courts later implemented. The growth of affirmative action was countered by the rise in racial conservatism. The achievement of civil rights movements led to the institutionalization of equality in large organizations. Most universities began to implement affirmative action policies voluntarily in order to create racial equality and counter social segregation. Post-secondary education treats white, black and Hispanic students differently, leading to racial inequality within institutions and the wastage of talent (Lipson, 2014). Scholars have developed theories to explain policy development over the years. Coercive isomorphism emphasizes the influence of external interests on the operations of some institutions. The approach defines bureaucratic institutions as easily influenced by organized interest groups. Another approach emphasizes the influence of law and envisions institutions as complying with legal reforms and judicial decisions. The structure of political institutions and historical contingent political processes has a crucial role in shaping policy development. Another approach states that policy development can be attributed to both voluntary and coerced approaches. The neoinstitutional theory emphasizes the need to evolve organizational policies and practices in order to apply